One Sketch Away

Agentic Ai Learning To Trust Probabilistic Logic In A Deterministic World

Agentic AI: Learning to Trust Probabilistic Logic in a Deterministic World

The Hype and the Hope

Every few months, our industry finds a new buzzword to rally around. Right now, it’s Agentic AI — and if you’ve watched any tech conference or YouTube demo lately, you’ve probably seen it too:
you say “Book me a 3-day trip to Tokyo next weekend”, and magically, an AI assistant checks flights, books hotels, suggests ramen spots, and wraps it all up in a sleek itinerary.

And as an engineer, you probably thought:
“Cool Demo, but isn’t that just a bunch of API calls triggered by natural language. Where’s the revolution?”

A rule-based system could do that faster, cheaper, and with fewer hallucinations. So again: where’s the intelligence?

You’re not alone.

demo

🧠 The Engineer’s Skepticism: Where’s the Real Innovation?

Let’s be honest. Most so-called “AI agent demos” are just glorified function orchestration — RAG plus function calling engine with an LLM sitting somewhere in the middle.

Common examples:

We’ve been doing this with RPA, BPM, and microservice orchestration for years. The only difference? Now you can talk to it in English.

So yes — for those of us wired for rules and determinism, the hype feels misplaced.

⚙️ Where Agentic AI Actually Starts

The difference emerges when things don’t go as planned.

What if:

A rule-based system crashes or escalates here.
An agentic system can adapt:

It’s not about replacing deterministic rules — it’s about making orchestration resilient in the face of uncertainty.

flow

🔍 Deconstructing the “Agent” — What’s Really Going On

Most “agents” today are really just this:

In other words: an event-driven orchestrator that happens to use English as its DSL.

Limitations

It’s easy to see why developers call this “glorified automation.”

🧩 Why It’s Still Interesting — The Hidden Hope

Because beneath the orchestration lies autonomy — and that’s new.

The leap comes from combining:

  1. Language reasoning — inferring goals.
  2. Environment awareness — observing context.
  3. Self-correcting loops — retrying and refining actions.

Together, they move us from automation to adaptive systems.

Early Signs

It’s not that agents are smart — it’s that they’re autonomous participants in workflows.

🏗️ Emerging Patterns of Agentic Architecture

arch

🧠 LLM-as-Orchestrator

The model decomposes goals into subtasks and routes to the right tools.

goal = "diagnose database issue"
plan = llm.plan(goal)
for step in plan:
    result = execute(step)
    llm.reflect(result)

🧰 Tool + Guardrail Layer

Clear schemas, permissions, and safe defaults define what the agent can do — and nothing more.

💾 Memory + Context Store

Vector stores, caches, and short-term memories preserve context between steps.

👩‍💻 Human-in-the-Loop

Confidence thresholds trigger human review — balancing autonomy with accountability.

🏦 Enterprise Reality — Security, Privacy, and Scale

Enterprises love automation, but they fear unpredictability.

Let’s take a real-world example — a bank. Governance and Compliance aren’t optional here; they’re the bloodstream of the system. You don’t want a random LLM waking up one morning and deciding:

“Hey, this payment looks fine — let me approve it!” or “Hmm, that forex transaction seems suspicious — I’ll just block it.”

That’s not intelligence; that’s chaos.

Banks rely on deterministic flows for a reason. These systems are built with layers of security, auditing, compliance, sanction screening, limit validation, concurrency controls — all the invisible scaffolding that makes the enterprise world safe and accountable.

So no, we don’t want some “AI intern” micromanaging mission-critical processes. We still want the rule engines to do what they do best — execute with precision, traceability, and zero drama.

For Agentic AI to succeed, we need controlled autonomy:

  1. Governance – operate under strict policy scopes.
  2. Traceability – log every decision and retry.
  3. Sandboxing – run agents in isolated, permissioned environments.
  4. Fail-safes – deterministic fallbacks when confidence drops.
  5. Compliance awareness – policy reasoning, not policy ignorance.

🔧 The Engineer’s Role — Bridging Two Worlds

Here’s the truth: all of this still runs on deterministic plumbing.

We still build:

Agentic AI doesn’t replace engineering — it layers probabilistic reasoning on deterministic infrastructure.

Think of it as giving software an intent interpreter — but we still define the rails, guardrails, and safety laws it runs on.

🚀 Towards the Future — Hope Beyond Hype

Where this is heading:

We’re moving toward a continuum — between structured rules and adaptive reasoning.

🧭 Closing Reflection

Agentic AI is neither sci-fi nor snake oil. It’s the next abstraction in computing — a shift from coding instructions to expressing intent.

The deterministic engineer in me still craves structure.
The architect in me, though, knows that intent-driven systems are inevitable.

So yes, most demos today are trivial.
But tomorrow, when agents start solving problems without being told every step — it’ll still be the deterministic rails we built that make autonomy trustworthy.

Written by Ranjith Vijayan
Architect • Technologist • Skeptic who still believes in well-defined APIs